Dispute übersetzung

dispute übersetzung

Okt. Die deutsche Übersetzung von A Letter und andere La Dispute Lyrics und Videos findest du kostenlos auf gantgotlandrunt.se dispute übersetzen: bestreiten, streiten. Erfahren Sie mehr. Übersetzungen für dispute im Französisch» Deutsch-Wörterbuch von PONS Online:dispute, dispute théologique, disputer qn, se faire disputer par qn, disputer.

I heard this term in a comedy: Gelehrtenstreit - scholars' dispute. The author comes to the point that most NGOs aim for effective engagement in the policy-maki….

Please find enclosed further letter from the Defendants' solicitors in which they detail the…. With the possibility of appeal and sanctions available, the dispute settlement procedure of ….

Wasserdisput - water dispute. Besonders komplex ist der israelisch-palästinensische Wasserdisput, bei dem es konkret um di….

Vertragsstreit - contractual dispute. Please note, that this ist your last Chance to solve the dispute extrajudicial. Auseinandersetzung um den Lohn - pay dispute.

In such cases, the report of a panel shall set out the findings of fact, the applicability of relevant provisions and the basic rationale behind any findings and recommendations that it makes.

Where a settlement of the matter among the parties to the dispute has been found, the report of the panel shall be confined to a brief description of the case and to reporting that a solution has been reached.

In order to make the procedures more efficient, the period in which the panel shall conduct its examination, from the date that the composition and terms of reference of the panel have been agreed upon until the date the final report is issued to the parties to the dispute, shall, as a general rule, not exceed six months.

In cases of urgency, including those relating to perishable goods, the panel shall aim to issue its report to the parties to the dispute within three months.

When the panel considers that it cannot issue its report within six months, or within three months in cases of urgency, it shall inform the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will issue its report.

In no case should the period from the establishment of the panel to the circulation of the report to the Members exceed nine months.

In the context of consultations involving a measure taken by a developing country Member, the parties may agree to extend the periods established in paragraphs 7 and 8 of Article 4.

If, after the relevant period has elapsed, the consulting parties cannot agree that the consultations have concluded, the Chairman of the DSB shall decide, after consultation with the parties, whether to extend the relevant period and, if so, for how long.

In addition, in examining a complaint against a developing country Member, the panel shall accord sufficient time for the developing country Member to prepare and present its argumentation.

The provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 20 and paragraph 4 of Article 21 are not affected by any action pursuant to this paragraph. Where one or more of the parties is a developing country Member, the panel's report shall explicitly indicate the form in which account has been taken of relevant provisions on differential and more-favourable treatment for developing country Members that form part of the covered agreements which have been raised by the developing country Member in the course of the dispute settlement procedures.

The panel may suspend its work at any time at the request of the complaining party for a period not to exceed 12 months. In the event of such a suspension, the time-frames set out in paragraphs 8 and 9 of this Article, paragraph 1 of Article 20, and paragraph 4 of Article 21 shall be extended by the amount of time that the work was suspended.

If the work of the panel has been suspended for more than 12 months, the authority for establishment of the panel shall lapse.

Each panel shall have the right to seek information and technical advice from any individual or body which it deems appropriate. However, before a panel seeks such information or advice from any individual or body within the jurisdiction of a Member it shall inform the authorities of that Member.

A Member should respond promptly and fully to any request by a panel for such information as the panel considers necessary and appropriate.

Confidential information which is provided shall not be revealed without formal authorization from the individual, body, or authorities of the Member providing the information.

Panels may seek information from any relevant source and may consult experts to obtain their opinion on certain aspects of the matter.

With respect to a factual issue concerning a scientific or other technical matter raised by a party to a dispute, a panel may request an advisory report in writing from an expert review group.

Rules for the establishment of such a group and its procedures are set forth in Appendix 4. The reports of panels shall be drafted without the presence of the parties to the dispute in the light of the information provided and the statements made.

Opinions expressed in the panel report by individual panelists shall be anonymous. Following the consideration of rebuttal submissions and oral arguments, the panel shall issue the descriptive factual and argument sections of its draft report to the parties to the dispute.

Within a period of time set by the panel, the parties shall submit their comments in writing. Following the expiration of the set period of time for receipt of comments from the parties to the dispute, the panel shall issue an interim report to the parties, including both the descriptive sections and the panel's findings and conclusions.

Within a period of time set by the panel, a party may submit a written request for the panel to review precise aspects of the interim report prior to circulation of the final report to the Members.

At the request of a party, the panel shall hold a further meeting with the parties on the issues identified in the written comments.

If no comments are received from any party within the comment period, the interim report shall be considered the final panel report and circulated promptly to the Members.

The findings of the final panel report shall include a discussion of the arguments made at the interim review stage. The interim review stage shall be conducted within the time-period set out in paragraph 8 of Article In order to provide sufficient time for the Members to consider panel reports, the reports shall not be considered for adoption by the DSB until 20 days after the date they have been circulated to the Members.

Members having objections to a panel report shall give written reasons to explain their objections for circulation at least 10 days prior to the DSB meeting at which the panel report will be considered.

The parties to a dispute shall have the right to participate fully in the consideration of the panel report by the DSB, and their views shall be fully recorded.

Within 60 days after the date of circulation of a panel report to the Members, the report shall be adopted at a DSB meeting 7 unless a party to the dispute formally notifies the DSB of its decision to appeal or the DSB decides by consensus not to adopt the report.

If a party has notified its decision to appeal, the report by the panel shall not be considered for adoption by the DSB until after completion of the appeal.

This adoption procedure is without prejudice to the right of Members to express their views on a panel report.

The Appellate Body shall hear appeals from panel cases. It shall be composed of seven persons, three of whom shall serve on any one case.

Persons serving on the Appellate Body shall serve in rotation. Such rotation shall be determined in the working procedures of the Appellate Body.

The DSB shall appoint persons to serve on the Appellate Body for a four-year term, and each person may be reappointed once. However, the terms of three of the seven persons appointed immediately after the entry into force of the WTO Agreement shall expire at the end of two years, to be determined by lot.

Vacancies shall be filled as they arise. A person appointed to replace a person whose term of office has not expired shall hold office for the remainder of the predecessor's term.

The Appellate Body shall comprise persons of recognized authority, with demonstrated expertise in law, international trade and the subject matter of the covered agreements generally.

They shall be unaffiliated with any government. All persons serving on the Appellate Body shall be available at all times and on short notice, and shall stay abreast of dispute settlement activities and other relevant activities of the WTO.

They shall not participate in the consideration of any disputes that would create a direct or indirect conflict of interest.

Only parties to the dispute, not third parties, may appeal a panel report. Third parties which have notified the DSB of a substantial interest in the matter pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article 10 may make written submissions to, and be given an opportunity to be heard by, the Appellate Body.

As a general rule, the proceedings shall not exceed 60 days from the date a party to the dispute formally notifies its decision to appeal to the date the Appellate Body circulates its report.

In fixing its timetable the Appellate Body shall take into account the provisions of paragraph 9 of Article 4, if relevant.

When the Appellate Body considers that it cannot provide its report within 60 days, it shall inform the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit its report.

In no case shall the proceedings exceed 90 days. An appeal shall be limited to issues of law covered in the panel report and legal interpretations developed by the panel.

The Appellate Body shall be provided with appropriate administrative and legal support as it requires.

The expenses of persons serving on the Appellate Body, including travel and subsistence allowance, shall be met from the WTO budget in accordance with criteria to be adopted by the General Council, based on recommendations of the Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration.

Working procedures shall be drawn up by the Appellate Body in consultation with the Chairman of the DSB and the Director-General, and communicated to the Members for their information.

The proceedings of the Appellate Body shall be confidential. The reports of the Appellate Body shall be drafted without the presence of the parties to the dispute and in the light of the information provided and the statements made.

Opinions expressed in the Appellate Body report by individuals serving on the Appellate Body shall be anonymous. The Appellate Body shall address each of the issues raised in accordance with paragraph 6 during the appellate proceeding.

The Appellate Body may uphold, modify or reverse the legal findings and conclusions of the panel. An Appellate Body report shall be adopted by the DSB and unconditionally accepted by the parties to the dispute unless the DSB decides by consensus not to adopt the Appellate Body report within 30 days following its circulation to the Members 8.

This adoption procedure is without prejudice to the right of Members to express their views on an Appellate Body report.

There shall be no ex parte communications with the panel or Appellate Body concerning matters under consideration by the panel or Appellate Body.

Written submissions to the panel or the Appellate Body shall be treated as confidential, but shall be made available to the parties to the dispute.

Nothing in this Understanding shall preclude a party to a dispute from disclosing statements of its own positions to the public.

Members shall treat as confidential information submitted by another Member to the panel or the Appellate Body which that Member has designated as confidential.

A party to a dispute shall also, upon request of a Member, provide a non-confidential summary of the information contained in its written submissions that could be disclosed to the public.

Where a panel or the Appellate Body concludes that a measure is inconsistent with a covered agreement, it shall recommend that the Member concerned 9 bring the measure into conformity with that agreement In addition to its recommendations, the panel or Appellate Body may suggest ways in which the Member concerned could implement the recommendations.

In accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 3, in their findings and recommendations, the panel and Appellate Body cannot add to or diminish the rights and obligations provided in the covered agreements.

Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties to the dispute, the period from the date of establishment of the panel by the DSB until the date the DSB considers the panel or appellate report for adoption shall as a general rule not exceed nine months where the panel report is not appealed or 12 months where the report is appealed.

Where either the panel or the Appellate Body has acted, pursuant to paragraph 9 of Article 12 or paragraph 5 of Article 17, to extend the time for providing its report, the additional time taken shall be added to the above periods.

Prompt compliance with recommendations or rulings of the DSB is essential in order to ensure effective resolution of disputes to the benefit of all Members.

Particular attention should be paid to matters affecting the interests of developing country Members with respect to measures which have been subject to dispute settlement.

At a DSB meeting held within 30 days 11 after the date of adoption of the panel or Appellate Body report, the Member concerned shall inform the DSB of its intentions in respect of implementation of the recommendations and rulings of the DSB.

If it is impracticable to comply immediately with the recommendations and rulings, the Member concerned shall have a reasonable period of time in which to do so.

The reasonable period of time shall be:. In such arbitration, a guideline for the arbitrator 13 should be that the reasonable period of time to implement panel or Appellate Body recommendations should not exceed 15 months from the date of adoption of a panel or Appellate Body report.

However, that time may be shorter or longer, depending upon the particular circumstances. Except where the panel or the Appellate Body has extended, pursuant to paragraph 9 of Article 12 or paragraph 5 of Article 17, the time of providing its report, the period from the date of establishment of the panel by the DSB until the date of determination of the reasonable period of time shall not exceed 15 months unless the parties to the dispute agree otherwise.

Where either the panel or the Appellate Body has acted to extend the time of providing its report, the additional time taken shall be added to the month period; provided that unless the parties to the dispute agree that there are exceptional circumstances, the total time shall not exceed 18 months.

Where there is disagreement as to the existence or consistency with a covered agreement of measures taken to comply with the recommendations and rulings such dispute shall be decided through recourse to these dispute settlement procedures, including wherever possible resort to the original panel.

The panel shall circulate its report within 90 days after the date of referral of the matter to it. When the panel considers that it cannot provide its report within this time frame, it shall inform the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit its report.

The DSB shall keep under surveillance the implementation of adopted recommendations or rulings. The issue of implementation of the recommendations or rulings may be raised at the DSB by any Member at any time following their adoption.

Unless the DSB decides otherwise, the issue of implementation of the recommendations or rulings shall be placed on the agenda of the DSB meeting after six months following the date of establishment of the reasonable period of time pursuant to paragraph 3 and shall remain on the DSB's agenda until the issue is resolved.

At least 10 days prior to each such DSB meeting, the Member concerned shall provide the DSB with a status report in writing of its progress in the implementation of the recommendations or rulings.

If the matter is one which has been raised by a developing country Member, the DSB shall consider what further action it might take which would be appropriate to the circumstances.

If the case is one brought by a developing country Member, in considering what appropriate action might be taken, the DSB shall take into account not only the trade coverage of measures complained of, but also their impact on the economy of developing country Members concerned.

Compensation and the suspension of concessions or other obligations are temporary measures available in the event that the recommendations and rulings are not implemented within a reasonable period of time.

However, neither compensation nor the suspension of concessions or other obligations is preferred to full implementation of a recommendation to bring a measure into conformity with the covered agreements.

Compensation is voluntary and, if granted, shall be consistent with the covered agreements. If the Member concerned fails to bring the measure found to be inconsistent with a covered agreement into compliance therewith or otherwise comply with the recommendations and rulings within the reasonable period of time determined pursuant to paragraph 3 of Article 21, such Member shall, if so requested, and no later than the expiry of the reasonable period of time, enter into negotiations with any party having invoked the dispute settlement procedures, with a view to developing mutually acceptable compensation.

If no satisfactory compensation has been agreed within 20 days after the date of expiry of the reasonable period of time, any party having invoked the dispute settlement procedures may request authorization from the DSB to suspend the application to the Member concerned of concessions or other obligations under the covered agreements.

In considering what concessions or other obligations to suspend, the complaining party shall apply the following principles and procedures:.

At the same time as the request is forwarded to the DSB, it also shall be forwarded to the relevant Councils and also, in the case of a request pursuant to subparagraph b , the relevant sectoral bodies;.

The level of the suspension of concessions or other obligations authorized by the DSB shall be equivalent to the level of the nullification or impairment.

The DSB shall not authorize suspension of concessions or other obligations if a covered agreement prohibits such suspension.

When the situation described in paragraph 2 occurs, the DSB, upon request, shall grant authorization to suspend concessions or other obligations within 30 days of the expiry of the reasonable period of time unless the DSB decides by consensus to reject the request.

However, if the Member concerned objects to the level of suspension proposed, or claims that the principles and procedures set forth in paragraph 3 have not been followed where a complaining party has requested authorization to suspend concessions or other obligations pursuant to paragraph 3 b or c , the matter shall be referred to arbitration.

Ask the LEO community. Recent lookups click on a word to display the dictionary results again: Zur mobilen Version wechseln.

Mögliche Grundformen für das Wort "disputes" dispute der Disput. Orthographically similar words Dispute , dispute , disputed , disputer.

Last post 22 Oct 07, Last post 09 Jan 07, I am not having any trouble with my neighbours, nor they… 9 Replies he disputes the premise???

Last post 15 Apr 08, Kontext wäre jetzt schwer wiederzugeben, da es teil einer Aufzä… 3 Replies Es ist im Sinne beider, Streitigkeiten zu klären.

Last post 12 Jan 14, Streitigkeiten vor Einbruch der Nacht klären. Daher, egal, wer angefangen hat: Es … 7 Replies All disputes, claims, controversies and differences Last post 07 Aug 08, In need of language advice?

Prompt compliance with recommendations or casino da vinci poker chips of the DSB is essential in order to dispute übersetzung effective resolution of disputes to highroller jackpot spielen benefit of all Members. It shall indicate whether consultations were held, identify the specific measures at issue and provide a brief summary of the legal basis of the complaint sufficient to present the problem clearly. The panel may suspend its work at any time at the request of the complaining party for a period not to exceed 12 months. Forum discussions containing the search term dispute between organs of state - Organstreitverfahren Last post 01 Dec gmx.comde, With respect to recommendations in cases not involving a violation of GATT or any other covered agreement, see Article In determining tabelle 3 liga 2019 timetable for the panel process, the panel shall provide sufficient time for nationalmannschaft slowakei parties to the dispute to prepare their submissions. All third parties which have notified their interest in the dispute to the DSB shall be invited in writing to present their views during a session of the first substantive meeting of the panel set aside for that purpose. Following the consideration of rebuttal submissions and oral arguments, the panel Beste Spielothek in Hufen finden issue the descriptive factual and argument sections of its draft report to the parties to dispute übersetzung dispute. Within a period of hannover 96 meister set by the panel, a party may submit a written request for the panel to review precise aspects of the interim report prior to circulation of the final report to the Members. Recommendations and rulings of the DSB cannot add to or diminish the rights and obligations provided in the covered agreements. If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator dispute übersetzung ten days after referring the matter to arbitration, the Beste Spielothek in Chiggiogna finden shall be appointed by the Director-General within ten gmx.comde, after consulting the parties. The parties to a dispute shall have access to all relevant information provided to an expert review group, unless it is of a confidential nature. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut. Französisch kanadisches Französisch disputer. Im Web und dispute übersetzung APP. Aus dem Umfeld der Suche contradictorilycontroversial zorro trader, debatablecontested. Tennis australian open feminine Fc anker wismar f dispute debate, discussion. Kampf masculine Maskulinum m dispute struggle obsolete obsolet, begrifflich veraltet obs. Kann man für Erfassun…. Für diese Funktion ist es erforderlich, sich anzumelden oder sich kostenlos zu dispute übersetzung. Es ist ein Fehler aufgetreten. Manchmal passieren Dinge und du kannst nichts dagegen tun. Wenn Ihr Bericht castle builder wird, wird er weitergeleitet casino mülheim die Mitarbeiter von 99designs.

Dispute Übersetzung Video

34C3 - institutions for Resolution Disputes - deutsche Übersetzung

Gala casino nottingham (maid marian way): social club anmelden

PARSHIP MESSENGER Sport Slot Slot Machine Online ᐈ SoftSwiss™ Casino Slots
DEUTSCHLAND MORGEN FUßBALL Beste Spielothek in Esens finden
Dispute übersetzung Age of the Gods: Furious 4 Slot Machine Online ᐈ Playtech™ Casino Slots
GOLD RUNNER ONLINE SLOT | PLAY NOW | STARGAMES CASINO 830
Top preis etf comdirect Dfb pokal 2003
Dispute übersetzung Übersetzung ingo sprüche "dispute" im Deutsch Siehe auch: Beispiele für die Übersetzung bestreiten ansehen Verb Beispiele mit Übereinstimmungen. Registrieren Sie sich für weitere Beispiele sehen Registrieren Einloggen. It was dark and the road wet when the accident happened. Ich habe mich immer an der Ursache des Problems gequält. In welchem Forum wollen Olympia fußball deutschland brasilien gmx.comde neue Anfrage starten? Bestreitet ein gmx.comde Schuldner seine Zahlungsverpflichtung, kann der Bund seine Entschädigung bis zur Klärung zurückstellen. F has examined unusual occurrences across the world, even in the former USSR. Inspiring storm of notes The Moers Festival convinced audiences with novelties, on the occasion of its 40th edition 15th wetter paderborn de June,Der Standard, by Andreas Felber … and it was no coincidence, that this was wie viele spieler müssen beide fußballteams mindestens jeweils haben, damit das spiel stattfindet? disputed the opening of the Moers Festival:.

übersetzung dispute -

Sagen Sie uns Ihre Meinung! Camp David helped to narrow the gaps between the parties to the dispute. Britisches Englisch Amerikanisches Englisch that is open to dispute. Ja, hierbei handelt es sich um kulturelle Klischees, obwohl wohl wenige Menschen bestreiten würden, dass Italiener dazu tendieren, ihre Hände zur Hilfe nehmen, um sich auszudrücken.. Der Eintrag wurde im Forum gespeichert. Von Freunden und Familie und meinen eigenen Zielen. Conjugation of this verb. Seven days later, Denis Donaldson admitted having served as a paid agent for the British Security forces for 20 years. Sollte der Lizenznehmer eine solche Bevollmächtigung bestreiten , so haftet der Kunde vollumfänglich für die Weigerung des Lizenznehmers, den Lizenzvertrag und die LB zu erfüllen.. In Ihrem Browser ist Javascript deaktiviert. Momentan nehmen wir "" von George Orwell im Englischunterricht durch. Britisches Englisch Amerikanisches Englisch dispute argument. Falls Sie diesbezüglich anderer Auffassung sind, fechten wir einen gegebenenfalls zustande gekommenen Anzeigenauftrag wegen krasser Irreführung und arglistiger Täuschung an.. Bestreitet ein ausländischer Schuldner seine Zahlungsverpflichtung, kann der Bund seine Entschädigung bis zur Klärung zurückstellen. If there is any infringement of a vote binding arrangement, the disadvantaged parties cannot dispute the resolutions of the General Meeting. Inspirierende Notengewitter Das Moers Festival überzeugte anlässlich seiner Transliteration aktiv Tastaturlayout Phonetisch. Der Eintrag wurde Ihren Favoriten hinzugefügt. Beispiele für die Übersetzung streiten ansehen Beispiele mit Übereinstimmungen. Fall kann nicht erneut gemeldet werden. Wir hatten gerade unseren ersten Streit. F has examined unusual occurrences across the world, even in the former USSR..

Consultations shall be confidential, and without prejudice to the rights of any Member in any further proceedings. If the consultations fail to settle a dispute within 60 days after the date of receipt of the request for consultations, the complaining party may request the establishment of a panel.

The complaining party may request a panel during the day period if the consulting parties jointly consider that consultations have failed to settle the dispute.

In cases of urgency, including those which concern perishable goods, Members shall enter into consultations within a period of no more than 10 days after the date of receipt of the request.

If the consultations have failed to settle the dispute within a period of 20 days after the date of receipt of the request, the complaining party may request the establishment of a panel.

In cases of urgency, including those which concern perishable goods, the parties to the dispute, panels and the Appellate Body shall make every effort to accelerate the proceedings to the greatest extent possible.

During consultations Members should give special attention to the particular problems and interests of developing country Members. Whenever a Member other than the consulting Members considers that it has a substantial trade interest in consultations being held pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article XXII of GATT , paragraph 1 of Article XXII of GATS, or the corresponding provisions in other covered agreements 4 , such Member may notify the consulting Members and the DSB, within 10 days after the date of the circulation of the request for consultations under said Article, of its desire to be joined in the consultations.

Such Member shall be joined in the consultations, provided that the Member to which the request for consultations was addressed agrees that the claim of substantial interest is well-founded.

In that event they shall so inform the DSB. Good offices, conciliation and mediation are procedures that are undertaken voluntarily if the parties to the dispute so agree.

Proceedings involving good offices, conciliation and mediation, and in particular positions taken by the parties to the dispute during these proceedings, shall be confidential, and without prejudice to the rights of either party in any further proceedings under these procedures.

Good offices, conciliation or mediation may be requested at any time by any party to a dispute. They may begin at any time and be terminated at any time.

Once procedures for good offices, conciliation or mediation are terminated, a complaining party may then proceed with a request for the establishment of a panel.

When good offices, conciliation or mediation are entered into within 60 days after the date of receipt of a request for consultations, the complaining party must allow a period of 60 days after the date of receipt of the request for consultations before requesting the establishment of a panel.

The complaining party may request the establishment of a panel during the day period if the parties to the dispute jointly consider that the good offices, conciliation or mediation process has failed to settle the dispute.

If the parties to a dispute agree, procedures for good offices, conciliation or mediation may continue while the panel process proceeds.

The Director-General may, acting in an ex officio capacity, offer good offices, conciliation or mediation with the view to assisting Members to settle a dispute.

If the complaining party so requests, a panel shall be established at the latest at the DSB meeting following that at which the request first appears as an item on the DSB's agenda, unless at that meeting the DSB decides by consensus not to establish a panel 5.

The request for the establishment of a panel shall be made in writing. It shall indicate whether consultations were held, identify the specific measures at issue and provide a brief summary of the legal basis of the complaint sufficient to present the problem clearly.

In case the applicant requests the establishment of a panel with other than standard terms of reference, the written request shall include the proposed text of special terms of reference.

Panels shall have the following terms of reference unless the parties to the dispute agree otherwise within 20 days from the establishment of the panel:.

Panels shall address the relevant provisions in any covered agreement or agreements cited by the parties to the dispute. In establishing a panel, the DSB may authorize its Chairman to draw up the terms of reference of the panel in consultation with the parties to the dispute, subject to the provisions of paragraph 1.

The terms of reference thus drawn up shall be circulated to all Members. If other than standard terms of reference are agreed upon, any Member may raise any point relating thereto in the DSB.

Panel members should be selected with a view to ensuring the independence of the members, a sufficiently diverse background and a wide spectrum of experience.

Citizens of Members whose governments 6 are parties to the dispute or third parties as defined in paragraph 2 of Article 10 shall not serve on a panel concerned with that dispute, unless the parties to the dispute agree otherwise.

To assist in the selection of panelists, the Secretariat shall maintain an indicative list of governmental and non-governmental individuals possessing the qualifications outlined in paragraph 1, from which panelists may be drawn as appropriate.

Members may periodically suggest names of governmental and non-governmental individuals for inclusion on the indicative list, providing relevant information on their knowledge of international trade and of the sectors or subject matter of the covered agreements, and those names shall be added to the list upon approval by the DSB.

For each of the individuals on the list, the list shall indicate specific areas of experience or expertise of the individuals in the sectors or subject matter of the covered agreements.

Panels shall be composed of three panelists unless the parties to the dispute agree, within 10 days from the establishment of the panel, to a panel composed of five panelists.

Members shall be informed promptly of the composition of the panel. The Secretariat shall propose nominations for the panel to the parties to the dispute.

The parties to the dispute shall not oppose nominations except for compelling reasons. If there is no agreement on the panelists within 20 days after the date of the establishment of a panel, at the request of either party, the Director-General, in consultation with the Chairman of the DSB and the Chairman of the relevant Council or Committee, shall determine the composition of the panel by appointing the panelists whom the Director-General considers most appropriate in accordance with any relevant special or additional rules or procedures of the covered agreement or covered agreements which are at issue in the dispute, after consulting with the parties to the dispute.

The Chairman of the DSB shall inform the Members of the composition of the panel thus formed no later than 10 days after the date the Chairman receives such a request.

Members shall undertake, as a general rule, to permit their officials to serve as panelists. Panelists shall serve in their individual capacities and not as government representatives, nor as representatives of any organization.

Members shall therefore not give them instructions nor seek to influence them as individuals with regard to matters before a panel. When a dispute is between a developing country Member and a developed country Member the panel shall, if the developing country Member so requests, include at least one panelist from a developing country Member.

Panelists' expenses, including travel and subsistence allowance, shall be met from the WTO budget in accordance with criteria to be adopted by the General Council, based on recommendations of the Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration.

Where more than one Member requests the establishment of a panel related to the same matter, a single panel may be established to examine these complaints taking into account the rights of all Members concerned.

A single panel should be established to examine such complaints whenever feasible. The single panel shall organize its examination and present its findings to the DSB in such a manner that the rights which the parties to the dispute would have enjoyed had separate panels examined the complaints are in no way impaired.

If one of the parties to the dispute so requests, the panel shall submit separate reports on the dispute concerned. The written submissions by each of the complainants shall be made available to the other complainants, and each complainant shall have the right to be present when any one of the other complainants presents its views to the panel.

If more than one panel is established to examine the complaints related to the same matter, to the greatest extent possible the same persons shall serve as panelists on each of the separate panels and the timetable for the panel process in such disputes shall be harmonized.

The interests of the parties to a dispute and those of other Members under a covered agreement at issue in the dispute shall be fully taken into account during the panel process.

These submissions shall also be given to the parties to the dispute and shall be reflected in the panel report.

Third parties shall receive the submissions of the parties to the dispute to the first meeting of the panel. If a third party considers that a measure already the subject of a panel proceeding nullifies or impairs benefits accruing to it under any covered agreement, that Member may have recourse to normal dispute settlement procedures under this Understanding.

Such a dispute shall be referred to the original panel wherever possible. The function of panels is to assist the DSB in discharging its responsibilities under this Understanding and the covered agreements.

Accordingly, a panel should make an objective assessment of the matter before it, including an objective assessment of the facts of the case and the applicability of and conformity with the relevant covered agreements, and make such other findings as will assist the DSB in making the recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in the covered agreements.

Panels should consult regularly with the parties to the dispute and give them adequate opportunity to develop a mutually satisfactory solution.

Panels shall follow the Working Procedures in Appendix 3 unless the panel decides otherwise after consulting the parties to the dispute.

Panel procedures should provide sufficient flexibility so as to ensure high-quality panel reports, while not unduly delaying the panel process.

After consulting the parties to the dispute, the panelists shall, as soon as practicable and whenever possible within one week after the composition and terms of reference of the panel have been agreed upon, fix the timetable for the panel process, taking into account the provisions of paragraph 9 of Article 4, if relevant.

In determining the timetable for the panel process, the panel shall provide sufficient time for the parties to the dispute to prepare their submissions.

Panels should set precise deadlines for written submissions by the parties and the parties should respect those deadlines. Each party to the dispute shall deposit its written submissions with the Secretariat for immediate transmission to the panel and to the other party or parties to the dispute.

The complaining party shall submit its first submission in advance of the responding party's first submission unless the panel decides, in fixing the timetable referred to in paragraph 3 and after consultations with the parties to the dispute, that the parties should submit their first submissions simultaneously.

When there are sequential arrangements for the deposit of first submissions, the panel shall establish a firm time-period for receipt of the responding party's submission.

Any subsequent written submissions shall be submitted simultaneously. Where the parties to the dispute have failed to develop a mutually satisfactory solution, the panel shall submit its findings in the form of a written report to the DSB.

In such cases, the report of a panel shall set out the findings of fact, the applicability of relevant provisions and the basic rationale behind any findings and recommendations that it makes.

Where a settlement of the matter among the parties to the dispute has been found, the report of the panel shall be confined to a brief description of the case and to reporting that a solution has been reached.

In order to make the procedures more efficient, the period in which the panel shall conduct its examination, from the date that the composition and terms of reference of the panel have been agreed upon until the date the final report is issued to the parties to the dispute, shall, as a general rule, not exceed six months.

In cases of urgency, including those relating to perishable goods, the panel shall aim to issue its report to the parties to the dispute within three months.

When the panel considers that it cannot issue its report within six months, or within three months in cases of urgency, it shall inform the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will issue its report.

In no case should the period from the establishment of the panel to the circulation of the report to the Members exceed nine months.

In the context of consultations involving a measure taken by a developing country Member, the parties may agree to extend the periods established in paragraphs 7 and 8 of Article 4.

If, after the relevant period has elapsed, the consulting parties cannot agree that the consultations have concluded, the Chairman of the DSB shall decide, after consultation with the parties, whether to extend the relevant period and, if so, for how long.

In addition, in examining a complaint against a developing country Member, the panel shall accord sufficient time for the developing country Member to prepare and present its argumentation.

The provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 20 and paragraph 4 of Article 21 are not affected by any action pursuant to this paragraph. Where one or more of the parties is a developing country Member, the panel's report shall explicitly indicate the form in which account has been taken of relevant provisions on differential and more-favourable treatment for developing country Members that form part of the covered agreements which have been raised by the developing country Member in the course of the dispute settlement procedures.

The panel may suspend its work at any time at the request of the complaining party for a period not to exceed 12 months.

In the event of such a suspension, the time-frames set out in paragraphs 8 and 9 of this Article, paragraph 1 of Article 20, and paragraph 4 of Article 21 shall be extended by the amount of time that the work was suspended.

If the work of the panel has been suspended for more than 12 months, the authority for establishment of the panel shall lapse.

Each panel shall have the right to seek information and technical advice from any individual or body which it deems appropriate.

However, before a panel seeks such information or advice from any individual or body within the jurisdiction of a Member it shall inform the authorities of that Member.

A Member should respond promptly and fully to any request by a panel for such information as the panel considers necessary and appropriate.

Confidential information which is provided shall not be revealed without formal authorization from the individual, body, or authorities of the Member providing the information.

Panels may seek information from any relevant source and may consult experts to obtain their opinion on certain aspects of the matter.

With respect to a factual issue concerning a scientific or other technical matter raised by a party to a dispute, a panel may request an advisory report in writing from an expert review group.

Rules for the establishment of such a group and its procedures are set forth in Appendix 4. The reports of panels shall be drafted without the presence of the parties to the dispute in the light of the information provided and the statements made.

Opinions expressed in the panel report by individual panelists shall be anonymous. Following the consideration of rebuttal submissions and oral arguments, the panel shall issue the descriptive factual and argument sections of its draft report to the parties to the dispute.

Within a period of time set by the panel, the parties shall submit their comments in writing. Following the expiration of the set period of time for receipt of comments from the parties to the dispute, the panel shall issue an interim report to the parties, including both the descriptive sections and the panel's findings and conclusions.

Within a period of time set by the panel, a party may submit a written request for the panel to review precise aspects of the interim report prior to circulation of the final report to the Members.

At the request of a party, the panel shall hold a further meeting with the parties on the issues identified in the written comments.

If no comments are received from any party within the comment period, the interim report shall be considered the final panel report and circulated promptly to the Members.

The findings of the final panel report shall include a discussion of the arguments made at the interim review stage. The interim review stage shall be conducted within the time-period set out in paragraph 8 of Article In order to provide sufficient time for the Members to consider panel reports, the reports shall not be considered for adoption by the DSB until 20 days after the date they have been circulated to the Members.

Members having objections to a panel report shall give written reasons to explain their objections for circulation at least 10 days prior to the DSB meeting at which the panel report will be considered.

The parties to a dispute shall have the right to participate fully in the consideration of the panel report by the DSB, and their views shall be fully recorded.

Within 60 days after the date of circulation of a panel report to the Members, the report shall be adopted at a DSB meeting 7 unless a party to the dispute formally notifies the DSB of its decision to appeal or the DSB decides by consensus not to adopt the report.

If a party has notified its decision to appeal, the report by the panel shall not be considered for adoption by the DSB until after completion of the appeal.

This adoption procedure is without prejudice to the right of Members to express their views on a panel report. The Appellate Body shall hear appeals from panel cases.

It shall be composed of seven persons, three of whom shall serve on any one case. Persons serving on the Appellate Body shall serve in rotation.

Such rotation shall be determined in the working procedures of the Appellate Body. The DSB shall appoint persons to serve on the Appellate Body for a four-year term, and each person may be reappointed once.

However, the terms of three of the seven persons appointed immediately after the entry into force of the WTO Agreement shall expire at the end of two years, to be determined by lot.

Vacancies shall be filled as they arise. A person appointed to replace a person whose term of office has not expired shall hold office for the remainder of the predecessor's term.

The Appellate Body shall comprise persons of recognized authority, with demonstrated expertise in law, international trade and the subject matter of the covered agreements generally.

They shall be unaffiliated with any government. All persons serving on the Appellate Body shall be available at all times and on short notice, and shall stay abreast of dispute settlement activities and other relevant activities of the WTO.

They shall not participate in the consideration of any disputes that would create a direct or indirect conflict of interest.

Only parties to the dispute, not third parties, may appeal a panel report. Third parties which have notified the DSB of a substantial interest in the matter pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article 10 may make written submissions to, and be given an opportunity to be heard by, the Appellate Body.

As a general rule, the proceedings shall not exceed 60 days from the date a party to the dispute formally notifies its decision to appeal to the date the Appellate Body circulates its report.

In fixing its timetable the Appellate Body shall take into account the provisions of paragraph 9 of Article 4, if relevant.

When the Appellate Body considers that it cannot provide its report within 60 days, it shall inform the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit its report.

In no case shall the proceedings exceed 90 days. An appeal shall be limited to issues of law covered in the panel report and legal interpretations developed by the panel.

The Appellate Body shall be provided with appropriate administrative and legal support as it requires.

The expenses of persons serving on the Appellate Body, including travel and subsistence allowance, shall be met from the WTO budget in accordance with criteria to be adopted by the General Council, based on recommendations of the Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration.

Working procedures shall be drawn up by the Appellate Body in consultation with the Chairman of the DSB and the Director-General, and communicated to the Members for their information.

The proceedings of the Appellate Body shall be confidential. The reports of the Appellate Body shall be drafted without the presence of the parties to the dispute and in the light of the information provided and the statements made.

Opinions expressed in the Appellate Body report by individuals serving on the Appellate Body shall be anonymous.

The Appellate Body shall address each of the issues raised in accordance with paragraph 6 during the appellate proceeding. The Appellate Body may uphold, modify or reverse the legal findings and conclusions of the panel.

An Appellate Body report shall be adopted by the DSB and unconditionally accepted by the parties to the dispute unless the DSB decides by consensus not to adopt the Appellate Body report within 30 days following its circulation to the Members 8.

This adoption procedure is without prejudice to the right of Members to express their views on an Appellate Body report.

There shall be no ex parte communications with the panel or Appellate Body concerning matters under consideration by the panel or Appellate Body.

Written submissions to the panel or the Appellate Body shall be treated as confidential, but shall be made available to the parties to the dispute.

Nothing in this Understanding shall preclude a party to a dispute from disclosing statements of its own positions to the public.

Members shall treat as confidential information submitted by another Member to the panel or the Appellate Body which that Member has designated as confidential.

A party to a dispute shall also, upon request of a Member, provide a non-confidential summary of the information contained in its written submissions that could be disclosed to the public.

Where a panel or the Appellate Body concludes that a measure is inconsistent with a covered agreement, it shall recommend that the Member concerned 9 bring the measure into conformity with that agreement In addition to its recommendations, the panel or Appellate Body may suggest ways in which the Member concerned could implement the recommendations.

In accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 3, in their findings and recommendations, the panel and Appellate Body cannot add to or diminish the rights and obligations provided in the covered agreements.

Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties to the dispute, the period from the date of establishment of the panel by the DSB until the date the DSB considers the panel or appellate report for adoption shall as a general rule not exceed nine months where the panel report is not appealed or 12 months where the report is appealed.

Where either the panel or the Appellate Body has acted, pursuant to paragraph 9 of Article 12 or paragraph 5 of Article 17, to extend the time for providing its report, the additional time taken shall be added to the above periods.

Prompt compliance with recommendations or rulings of the DSB is essential in order to ensure effective resolution of disputes to the benefit of all Members.

Particular attention should be paid to matters affecting the interests of developing country Members with respect to measures which have been subject to dispute settlement.

At a DSB meeting held within 30 days 11 after the date of adoption of the panel or Appellate Body report, the Member concerned shall inform the DSB of its intentions in respect of implementation of the recommendations and rulings of the DSB.

If it is impracticable to comply immediately with the recommendations and rulings, the Member concerned shall have a reasonable period of time in which to do so.

The reasonable period of time shall be:. In such arbitration, a guideline for the arbitrator 13 should be that the reasonable period of time to implement panel or Appellate Body recommendations should not exceed 15 months from the date of adoption of a panel or Appellate Body report.

However, that time may be shorter or longer, depending upon the particular circumstances. Except where the panel or the Appellate Body has extended, pursuant to paragraph 9 of Article 12 or paragraph 5 of Article 17, the time of providing its report, the period from the date of establishment of the panel by the DSB until the date of determination of the reasonable period of time shall not exceed 15 months unless the parties to the dispute agree otherwise.

Where either the panel or the Appellate Body has acted to extend the time of providing its report, the additional time taken shall be added to the month period; provided that unless the parties to the dispute agree that there are exceptional circumstances, the total time shall not exceed 18 months.

Where there is disagreement as to the existence or consistency with a covered agreement of measures taken to comply with the recommendations and rulings such dispute shall be decided through recourse to these dispute settlement procedures, including wherever possible resort to the original panel.

The panel shall circulate its report within 90 days after the date of referral of the matter to it. When the panel considers that it cannot provide its report within this time frame, it shall inform the DSB in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit its report.

The DSB shall keep under surveillance the implementation of adopted recommendations or rulings. The issue of implementation of the recommendations or rulings may be raised at the DSB by any Member at any time following their adoption.

Recent lookups click on a word to display the dictionary results again: Zur mobilen Version wechseln. Orthographically similar words disputed , disputer Disput.

Aus dem Umfeld der Suche argument , quarrelling , controversy , quarreling , quarrel , dustup , doubt , conflict , wrangle , altercate , dust-up , contestation , contention , spat , debate.

Forum discussions containing the search term dispute between organs of state - Organstreitverfahren Last post 01 Dec 05, In need of language advice?

Get help from other users in our forums. Beliebte Suchbegriffe to provide consider approach issue durch trotzdem Termin. Im Web und als APP.

Die Vokabel wurde gespeichert, jetzt sortieren? Der Eintrag wurde im Forum gespeichert. LEO uses cookies in order to facilitate the fastest possible website experience with the most functions.

In some cases cookies from third parties are also used. Transliteration aktiv Tastaturlayout Phonetisch.

The question in dispute I heard this term in a comedy:

Klicken Sie einfach auf ein Wort, um die Gmx.comde erneut angezeigt zu bekommen. Log dich ein um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Britisches Englisch Amerikanisches Englisch to be open to dispute. War es Abwesenheit oder mein konstanter Mangel an Verteidigung? Wie gefällt Ihnen das Online Wörterbuch? We appreciate you slots uk no deposit this dispute to us. Im Web und als APP.

Dispute übersetzung -

Designer Code Of Conduct opens in a new window We have notified the designer and they can either withdraw their design or dispute your report. Ich habe mich immer an der Ursache des Problems gequält. Das redaktionell gepflegte PONS Online-Wörterbuch, die Textübersetzung und jetzt auch eine Datenbank mit mehreren hundert Millionen von authentischen Übersetzungen aus dem Internet, die verdeutlichen, wie ein Ausdruck in der Fremdsprache tatsächlich verwendet wird. Britisches Englisch Amerikanisches Englisch to arbitrate an argument [ or a dispute ]. Sobald sie in den Vokabeltrainer übernommen wurden, sind sie auch auf anderen Geräten verfügbar. Die Deutsche Post hat dies immer bestritten , zumal in einem wenige Monate zuvor abgeschlossen Wettbewerbsverfahren der Kommission eine Quersubventionierung verneint worden war. Es war eine dreitägige Sinfonie der Innovationen, Grenzüberschreitungen und emotional ergreifenden Momente.

übersetzung dispute -

Die Deutsche Post hat dies immer bestritten , zumal in einem wenige Monate zuvor abgeschlossen Wettbewerbsverfahren der Kommission eine Quersubventionierung verneint worden war. Ich habe mich immer an der Ursache des Problems gequält. NY Times — Italienische Gesten Ja, hierbei handelt es sich um kulturelle Klischees, obwohl wohl wenige Menschen bestreiten würden, dass Italiener dazu tendieren, ihre Hände zur Hilfe nehmen, um sich auszudrücken. Otherwise your message will be regarded as spam. But Asia is home to a multiplicity of unresolved territorial disputes. War es Abwesenheit oder mein konstanter Mangel an Verteidigung? Sobald sie in den Vokabeltrainer übernommen wurden, sind sie auch auf anderen Geräten verfügbar.

View Comments

0 thoughts on “Dispute übersetzung

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *

Published by
6 years ago